Quoting%20commentary for Pesachim 195:13

נתערב בבכורות ר"ש אומר אם חבורות כהנים יאכלו: <big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big>

He must bring it for the second Passover.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If he did not keep the first through his bereavement.');">⁹</span> Abaye said, It is taught disjunctively: If he died after midday, [and] his son is registered with him, he must bring it for the sake of a Passover. If he died before midday, [and] his son is not registered with him, he must bring it as a peace-offering. R'Sherabia said: In truth it means where he died after midday, the case being e.g. , where his father was in a dying condition at midday.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hence if his son was registered with him, he must bring it as a Passover, since that obligation preceded his bereavement. But if his son was not registered with him, he must bring it as a peace-offering, for since his father was already in a dying condition, midday did not establish it as a Passover-offering.');">¹⁰</span> R'Ashi said: In truth it means that he died after midday,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' But was not necessarily dying at midday.');">¹¹</span> this being in accordance with R'Simeon, who maintained: Live animals cannot be [permanently] rejected.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Save when they become actually unfit, e.g.,if they receive a blemish or are given as a harlot's hire (v. Deut. XXIII, 19) .');">¹²</span> Rabina said: [It means] e.g. , where he set it aside after midday and its owner died after midday, and he holds: [only] midday establishes it.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' But not the rest of the time allotted for its slaughtering. Hence it has not been established and therefore it cannot be rejected. Consequently, if his son was not registered with him, he must bring it as a peace-offering.');">¹³</span> M I S H N A H. IF A PASSOVER-OFFERING BECAME MIXED UP WITH OTHER SACRIFICES, ALL MUST BE LEFT TO GRAZE UNTIL THEY BECOME UNFIT [THROUGH A BLEMISH], THEN BE SOLD, AND FOR THE PRICE OF THE BEST ONE MUST PURCHASE [AN ANIMAL] OF EACH DENOMINATION, AND MAKE UP<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'lose'.');">¹⁴</span> THE EXCESS FROM ONE'S PRIVATE PURSE.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'house'. Thus: if three lambs of unequal value, one dedicated for a Passover-offering, another for a guilt-offering, and the third for a burnt-offering, became mixed up, they must all be sold. Since the best may have been any of the three sacrifices, he must buy an animal for each sacrifice at the cost of the best; naturally he will need more than they realized, and he must make that up himself.-Instead of 'he must lose' there is a variant: 'and he must set aside'.');">¹⁵</span> IF IT BECAME MIXED UP WITH FIRSTLINGS,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which are offered in the same way as Passover-offerings, viz., the blood of both is sprinkled in the same way, and neither require the waving of the breast and shoulder, nor laying of the hands, nor libations.');">¹⁶</span> -R'SIMEON SAID: IF [THE PASSOVER-OFFERING BELONGED TO] A COMPANY OF PRIESTS, THEY EAT [ALL ON THAT NIGHT].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Stipulating at the time of slaughtering: 'Whichever is the Passover-offering, we sacrifice it as such, and whichever is the firstling, we offer it as such'.');">¹⁷</span>

Explore quoting%20commentary for Pesachim 195:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.